20 years: Research & banking
In this video, January examines the new regime for bank solvency subsequent to the financial crisis of 2008, taking a closer look at the ever evolving regulatory landscape for bank capital and hybrid instruments.
In this video, January examines the new regime for bank solvency subsequent to the financial crisis of 2008, taking a closer look at the ever evolving regulatory landscape for bank capital and hybrid instruments.
Finance Unlocked is the video learning platform built for finance professionals.
This content is also available as part of a premium, accredited video course. Sign up for a 14-day trial to watch for free.
11 mins 17 secs
The 2008 global financial crisis led to material changes in the way bank capital is defined and calculated, and to more stringent capital adequacy regulations to ensure banks have sufficient capital to remain solvent without any need for taxpayer bail-outs. The specific trigger for the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008 was an acute lack of liquidity i.e. an ability to refinance liabilities coming due and fund day-to-day activities. The acute liquidity crisis was directly precipitated by fears about the bank’s solvency.
Key learning objectives:
Define a bank’s basic capital structure today
Define bank solvency and understand why low solvency levels are a problem
Outline improvements that have been made to capital standards in recent years
This content is also available as part of a premium, accredited video course. Sign up for a 14-day trial to watch for free.
A bank’s solvency is a measure of its capital; put simply: assets minus liabilities. At the time of the global financial crisis, minimum capital requirements for banks were woefully inadequate. Many systemically-important banks operated very low solvency levels i.e. were woefully under-capitalised.
They had very slim capital buffers to absorb potential future losses from hundreds of billions in assets, and capital ratios were easy to manipulate using a variety of preference shares and structured hybrid securities. Old-style hybrid long-term securities (which had characteristics of both debt and equity) included now-defunct Upper Tier II bonds as well as a class of subordinated debt known as Lower Tier II bonds. The primary problem with these instruments was that they could only absorb losses in the event of a liquidation or when the bank had become a gone-concern.
Over the past decade governments, regulators and financial institutions themselves have made a number of game-changing strides to strengthen bank solvency levels: increasing minimum capital requirements and introducing stricter rules on what constitutes bank capital. Improvements include:
Bank capital structures today are much simpler. They ensure that institutions are adequately equipped to continue critical functions without threatening financial market stability. And there is a clear hierarchy of loss absorption and capital subordination that ensures the burden of losses in any financial crisis situation is transferred from taxpayers to stakeholders. This is referred to as a bail-in regime.
This content is also available as part of a premium, accredited video course. Sign up for a 14-day trial to watch for free.