Misconceptions of the 2008 Financial Crisis

Misconceptions of the 2008 Financial Crisis

Kevin Gardiner

30 years: Macroeconomist

Many contrasting view are held about the causes of the global financial crisis. Kevin outlines his view on the matter and why it differs to the popular opinion.

Many contrasting view are held about the causes of the global financial crisis. Kevin outlines his view on the matter and why it differs to the popular opinion.

Speak to an expert

Speak to an expert today to access this and all of the content on our platform.

Misconceptions of the 2008 Financial Crisis

9 mins 42 secs

Overview

The common (misguided) view of the global financial crisis of 2008 that there was too much debt in the economy. Instead the cause can be traced back to the collapse of the US housing market and the complicated securities that mortgages were backing. This occurred because of a mix of overly ambitious policy and reckless lending. Collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) and really complex securitisations meant that, when things went wrong, it was tremendously difficult to unravel exactly what the root cause was.

Key learning objectives:

  • Discuss the popular view for the cause of the financial crisis

  • Explain the the real cause of the financial crisis in 2008

Speak to an expert

Speak to an expert today to access this and all of the content on our platform.

Summary
Why did the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) happen?
All accounts would place debt at the centre of the story. For many people, there was just too much debt out there in the global economy, capital markets effectively imploded under the weight of all that debt. Alongside those concerns about debt, other concerns have developed more recently. People suggest that an ageing economy just cannot grow very quickly anymore or that we are running out of natural resources.
What is wrong with the popular view of the GFC?
The popular view, the idea that because of all that debt and all those other concerns, the global economy was built on sand and was an accident waiting to happen. It is inaccurate. The problems were in the financial sector itself, not in the global economy. When we look at what actually went wrong in 2008 it was a problem with some very specific problems focused in the sub-prime component of the US housing market. This occurred because of a mix of overly ambitious policy and reckless lending. Collateralised debt obligations, really complex securitisations and so forth, meant that when things went wrong, it was tremendously difficult to unravel exactly what had gone wrong. We saw some institutions become insolvent, and when they went bust, they effectively froze the global money supply as other banks wouldn't lend to the stricken banks.
Why does it matter if the popular view is mistaken?
If you feel that the world economy can't grow because there is too much debt, you're going to be pretty pessimistic about the prospects for the economy and for investment markets as a result. The total amount of debt is not going to fall any time soon. It was never going to fall any time soon because as the global economy becomes wealthier, balance sheets get bigger and every financial asset is matched by a financial liability and It's quite likely that that process will continue. In aggregate, the global financial crisis could only be a liquidity crunch, not a solvency issue. This can be solved easily as central banks create liquidity on demand. The global economy now is roughly two fifths bigger than it was at the peak before the global financial crisis. Unemployment in the United States, the U. K, Germany and Japan is at the lowest levels we've seen for decades, and corporate profitability is pretty healthy. If you had focused too much on that big caricature, the idea that the global economy couldn't grow because of all that debt, you would have missed out on a lot of opportunity.

Speak to an expert

Speak to an expert today to access this and all of the content on our platform.

Kevin Gardiner

Kevin Gardiner

Kevin has worked in the city for over 30 years, with experience as an economist, investor strategist and chief investment officer. Kevin proudly coined the term "Celtic Tiger" used to refer to the Irish economy.

There are no available videos from "Kevin Gardiner"